Dr. Uttam Das working for reform of legal education

Dr. Uttam Kumar Das, a Human Rights Lawyer in Bangladesh has been working for reform of legal education.

He was a Hubert H. Humphrey Fellow in the year 2009-2010 and was affiliated with the University of Minnesota Law School and Human Rights Center in Minneapolis, U.S.A.

His focus was on "Laws and Policies Related to Labor Trafficking in the United States of America." As part of the Fellowship, Dr. Das volunteered for the Refugee and Immigrant Program at the Advocates for Human Rights, an international human rights organization in Minneapolis.

Dr. Das is admitted as an Advocate (Attorney) in the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and is providing pro bono legal advice to promote rights of migrants, refugees and victims of human trafficking. He also lectures regularly on human rights issues at law schools in Dhaka.

He has organized two regional seminars in Dhaka on “Ethics in Legal Profession" and "Legal Education in South Asia," respectively on January 15 and January 16, 2011 under the banner of the South Asian Institute of Advanced Legal and Human Rights Studies (SAILS). Dr. Das is now working as the Deputy Director at SAILS.

The seminars brought together the Law Minister, Chairpersons of National Human Rights Commission and Law Commission of Bangladesh, policy makers from Bar Council and renowned jurists and legal academics among others from Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Sri Lanka.

Major newspapers in Bangladesh gave significant coverage of the programs; link of a relevant report: http://www.thedailystar.net/law/2011/01/04/event.htm

"The aged-old legal education in Bangladesh needs drastic reform and standardization to meet the need of the time," says Dr. Das.

According to him, "legal education should be human-centric and practical which could be able to contribute to pro-people justice system." He is also advocating for incorporating human rights issues in legal curriculum, and contributing to national newspapers on the issue.

He has been liaising with the legal academics, law schools, Bar Council, Law Commission and National Human Rights Commission for the reform.

Dr. Das is a visiting faculty to the Kathmandu School of Law in Nepal. He runs a blog as well; link: http://udas1971.blogspot.com.

He has been invited to present key note papers at symposiums in the capital recently organized by the largest NGO, BRAC and migrant rights organization, WARBE Development Foundation.

Dr. Das was part of a three-member technical team commissioned by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in 2010 to draft a comprehensive law on human trafficking. The draft law is now under the review of the relevant ministries. The Government of Bangladesh is likely to adopt the law soon as an Act endorsed by the National Parliament.

He formally worked with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and International Organization for Migration (IOM).

Dr. Das got his Doctor of Philosophy from the Institute of Bangladesh Studies (IBS) at the University of Rajshahi in Bangladesh. He is now scheduled to get his second LL.M. (Master of Law) with concentration in International Human Rights Law from the University of Minnesota Law School.

Law Event: Introduce ethics in legal curriculum*

Dr. Uttam Kumar Das

Presenters, discussants, designated guests and participants at two seminars recommended to introduce ethical issues in the curriculum of law schools and bar examinations. They also recommended an immediate reform of legal education in Bangladesh and urged for a Legal Education Council to monitor and streamline standard of legal and justice education. The seminars also urged for introducing courses on comparative study of South Asian Laws and Constitutions to promote regional cooperation and unity.

It also recommended expanding opportunity to study law and human rights in the country. Dhaka-based organization, South Asian Institute of Advanced Legal and Human Rights Studies (SAILS) organized two seminars on “Ethics in Legal Profession” and “Legal Education in South Asia,” respectively on 15 and 16 January 2011 at city's BRAC Center Inn. Barrister Shafique Ahmed, Minister for Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs was the Chief Guest at the closing session of the seminar on 15 January. Advocate Abdul Baset Majumder, Vice-Chairman of Bangladesh Bar Council was the Guest of Honour. Eminent Jurist and Chairperson of SAILS, Dr. Kamal Hossain presided over the session.

Professor Dr. M. Shah Alam, Chairman of Law Commission was the Chief Guest at the opening session on 15 January while presided over by Professor Dr. Yubaraj Sangroula, Executive Director of Kathmandu School of Law (KSL) in Nepal. Professor Dr. Mizanur Rahman, Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of Bangladesh was the Chief Guest at the closing session of the seminar on “Legal Education in South Asia” on 16 January while Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat, Vice-Chancellor of BRAC University was the Special Guest. Dr. Kamal Hossain presided over the session as well. Country papers on legal education were presented by Professor Dr. M. Shah Alam, Chairman of Law Commission of Bangladesh and Professor M. Zakir Hossain, Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Chittagong covering Bangladesh; Professor Dr. Deepika Udagama, University of Peradeniya on Sri Lanka; Professor Dr. Yubaraj Sangroula, Executive Director of KSL on Nepal and Dr. Clearance J. Dias, President of the New York-based International Center for Law in Development on Indian legal education.

Dr. Abdullah Al Faruque, Associate Professor and former Chairman of the Department of Law, University of Chittagong; Dr. Faustina Pereira, Director of Human Rights and Legal Service (HRLS) Programme of BRAC and Dr. Naim Ahmed, Advocate of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh were panel discussants.

Barrister Shafique Ahmed said that for an effective justice system there is a dire need for competent, skilled, honest and sincere lawyers and judges. For this legal education and professional trainings could play a pivotal role. He emphasized on the professional integrity and sincerity of lawyers and judges to ensure justice for poor people. Rejecting the criticism on having over increasing number of lawyers, the Law Minister said that for a country with 160 million people 40,000 or so number of lawyers is not excessive. Rather we need more of them. However, at the same time we have to look into the standard of law graduates who are joining bars and benches; and how sensitive they are to work for the cause of human rights and justice, he opined.

Professor Mizanur Rahman recommended for a model law university in Bangladesh which would go beyond traditional approach and would teach law covering its broader meaning and concepts which would include people's culture, diversity, rights, aspiration, and hope among others. He also emphasized on the practical teaching of law.

Law Commission Chairman, Professor Dr. Shah Alam urged for more active role of Bangladesh Bar Council in standardizing legal education and promoting ethics in the profession. He also recommended for creating separate cadres for judicial and legal services. Dr. Alam said that if we failed to standardize our legal education immediately incorporating high ethical values and moral standards among others, as a nation we would suffer in future. He urged the government to establish a model law university on the basis of best practices already there in countries like India and Nepal. Referring to aged-old curriculum, Professor Yubaraj Sangroula of KSL said that legal education should not be confined to studying of legal rules and law books only; rather it should be inter-disciplinary and have links to various issues of the society and people. Professor Zakir Hossain of the University of Chittagong urged to set up a national vision for legal education in the country. He also recommended for special training programmes for lawyers and legal professionals and initiate collaboration among law schools, National Human Rights Commission, Law Commission and Judicial Administration Training Institute (JATI). Dr. Kamal Hossain, Chairperson of SAILS, urged for streamlining and standardizing legal education in Bangladesh. He emphasized on the need of consensus, strategy and initiatives immediately in this regard. “We all have to stand up against bad practices in the legal and judicial system,” he said. He also emphasized for establishing a South Asian Law University in Bangladesh. SAILS also felicitated Professor Dr. Mizanur Rahman for being honored with “Professor N. R. Madhava Menon Best Law Teacher Award 2010.” SAILS Chairperson Dr. Kamal Hossain handed over a crest to Professor Rahman at the closing session of the seminar on legal education.

The writer is Deputy Director, South Asian Institute of Advanced Legal and Human Rights Studies (SAILS).

*Originally appeared in The Daily Star (Law & Our Rights Section), January 22, 2011; link: http://www.thedailystar.net/law/2011/01/04/event.htm

Whither Legal Education in Bangladesh*

Dr. Uttam Kumar Das

Like many others, I am concerned with the standard of the legal education in Bangladesh. The low standard of this education is contributing to having graduates with skills below the expected and desired standard. The legal profession, judiciary and other services suffer when such people join the profession.

Then how can we compete in the global context?

However, this is not the reality for legal education only. The same also goes for other disciplines as well (with few exceptions). But our concentration here is on legal education.

According to renowned Indian legal academic, Professor N. R. Madhava Menon, ‘law as a discipline is to play multiple tasks in a society and lawyers are expected to act as change agents and social engineers in governance and development of the nation.

In a recent discussion, a former Judge of the High Court Division, wondered about the initiative from the Bar Council or the Bar Association which has produced lawyers like Dr. Kamal Hossain, Barrister Amir-ul Islam …with regard to our legal education and future of the legal profession. According to him, the legal profession should not be open for all but for those law graduates who have adequate legal knowledge, have sufficient skills and are conversant with the norms and ethics of the profession.

Again, Professor Menon who pioneered the global-standard legal education through establishing National Law School of India University in Bangalore, observes that the goal of the legal education is to provide: (i) competent lawyers, prosecutors, and judges to administer the judiciary, (ii) well-trained law personnel for providing legal services to the government departments and corporate institutions, (iii) legal researchers and academics for legal education, legal reform, good governance, and (iv) disseminate legal knowledge and culture conducive to the Constitution, rule of law, good governance, human rights, and democracy.

Therefore, what is the existing status of legal education here?

We all are talking about bringing culture of respect for human rights, rule of law, and democracy; however, we are not paying attention to the basic - the legal and human rights education.

The donor agencies, which have been partnering for awareness and training programmes are not paying attention to the root of the issue- the legal and human rights education. With regard to training, NGO initiatives are also not sufficient due to deficiency in their own capacity and expertise, lack of continuity and corruption.

The desired legal education, as visioned by Professor Menon, should be problem solving which would give opportunities to students for legal analysis and reasoning, research and writing, investigation and marshalling facts, communication, negotiating, counseling, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and litigation. The graduates are expected to manage efficiently the legal work and will have right attitudes to the dignity of the profession of law and justice. They would nourish and fight to protect the professional values and integrity, and to promote and practice fairness and freedom from bias. How close or far away are we from those?

Recently, I was attending a seminar on the Alternative Dispute Resolution jointly organised by the Law Commission and the South Asian Institute of Advanced Legal and Human Rights Studies (SAILS) in Chittagong. The issue of the condition of legal education came up in the discussion. The Chairman of the Law Commission, Justice Abdur Rashid warned all of us that if we did not pay immediate attention then we shall have to pay heavily in future.

The existing scenario of the legal education has been documented by Professor Menon in a study almost a decade ago commissioned by a donor agency. He also come up with a comprehensive set of recommendations and plan for streamlining our legal education. However, there is no headway since then.

Professor Menon piloted the plan of Indian Bar Council for a world-class legal education through establishment of the National Law School of India University in Bangalore. The same model has been replicated all over India over the years; there are now more than 15 Law Universities in India. Even, Kathmandu Law School in Nepal has earned fame for its quality curriculum, teaching methods, research and publications. Unfortunately, we are far behind still now.

In our country, we have four streams of legal education. There are law departments in four public universities. Around 35 private universities have law departments or schools. There are 70 law colleges under the National University all over the country. There are external programmes of a few British universities as well.

The curriculum and teaching methods are mostly outdated (with exceptions for few courses in few public/private universities). Very few institutions have schemes to engage students so that they could learn legal research and writing skills with regard to a social problem.

The law schools also follow a faulty selection process for teachers. There is no faculty tenure, service conditions, evaluation processes etc.

Professor Menon rightly observed, years of experience do not make a good law teacher unless the experience is grounded on experimentation, endeavour, and creativity.

In the United States, law schools provide extra credits in selecting faculty members to those who have experiences in research works, publications, advocacy and pro bono works, and working experience for international and national legal or human rights organisations alongside the academic excellence.

Here in Bangladesh, though the law schools/departments have their “journals” (not regular in publication), those follow the rule of “limiting the knowledge.” In case of public university, only the respective faculty members could contribute articles (but no question about independent review and competitive selection process). Those publications are also not available for public, even with payment. (At least I have that experience on a couple of occasions).

Bangladesh Bar Council, the statutory body to look after the standard of legal education and ethics in legal profession has also been failing to play its due role. It has reportedly no activity with regard to research and experiment on legal education, curriculum and related professional issues. According to some observers, the Council has turned into a place of “clerical activity” for issuing licenses to advocates and a “political platform for a section of lawyers” to compete with each other. But it should be above and beyond political divisions. The agency has no innovation and creativity with regard to academic and research activities for quality legal education and related matters for legal profession. It has no regular research projects and publications as well.

Given my recent experience in the United States, I found out how an NGO like the American Bar Association (ABA) is serious with regard to development of the quality of legal education, research, publication and above all quality of the graduates coming out of law schools. There, the Bar Examination Board and respective State Supreme Courts are the authority to take examinations for fresh law graduates and to issuing license as an Attorney (Advocate in Bangladesh). However, the law schools have to have accreditation from the ABA who inspects law schools on a cyclic order. State and County Bar Associations also have lot of activities for the professional development.

Recently, I had had a discussion with M. Professor Shah Alam, Member of the Law Commission. He had been my teacher at the University of Rajshahi (before he had moved to establish the Department of Law at the University of Chittagong). I find the same concerns as of mine in Professor Alam. He is also worried about the quality of legal education and absence of initiative for improvement. This seasoned legal academic expressed his anguish regarding no help from the related ministry and others concerned in this regard.

I came to know from Professor Alam that he and Professor Mizanur Rahman (presently the Chairman of National Human Rights Commission) was commissioned by the World Bank almost a decade ago for conducting two studies on the legal education and clinical legal education in the country. Following that the Law Commission (Professor Alam was a Member earlier as well) has submitted a completed proposal for streamlining the legal education to the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs. However, there is no progress in this regard so far. There is no vision and direction on legal education in the newly adopted Education Policy as well.

Then, how we would get skilled personnel to compete and negotiate in a globalised world in government dealings, trades and business.

I wonder, given a good number of our policy makers having background in law and being in legal profession, how come the matter is getting ignored for years. This is high time for us to move on and take up the issue immediately. Otherwise, our dream for a pro-active and pro-people legal and judicial system would remain a distant dream. We should aim to make the “legal studies intellectually stimulating, socially relevant and professionally significant,” as Professor Menon observes.

Writer is an Advocate (Attorney) in the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. He is also a researcher and analyst on legal and human rights issues.

* Originally appeared in the Daily Sun, Dhaka, 14 December 2010; link: http://www.daily-sun.com/index.php?view=details&type=daily_sun_news&pub_no=67&cat_id=&menu_ id=17&news_ type_id=1&index=0&archiev=yes&arch_date=14-12-2010

Managing Migration Sector [in Bangladesh]*

Dr. Uttam Kumar Das

Bangladesh is a major country of origin for migrant workers. It is estimated that more than seven million Bangladeshis are now working and living abroad. It has a huge potential given the demand overseas for workers and challenges with lack of governance and malpractices in the sector.

The term migrant workers refers to a person who is to be engaged, is engaged or has been engaged in a remunerated activity in a State of which he or she is not a national (Art 2 of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, 1990).

In this article, the migrant workers are referred to those who are going abroad temporarily with contractual jobs.

Given the over population in Bangladesh, limited resources, and limited number of available jobs both in public and private sectors we are having difficulty in absorbing all our active and working people joining the workforce each year.

On the other hand, countries in the Western Europe, North America, Africa and even in the Eastern Asia need migrant workers to meet up their need to run the industries, construction works, health, hospitality, and service sectors among others.

The country could earn a record amount of US$ 9.6 billion as remittances during 2008-2009 fiscal year. In the year of 2009, the amount was again nearly US$ 10 billion (74,000 crore Taka) though the year was hit by the global economic recession. Actually, the remittance remained almost steady though the number of migrating population get down to almost half (475,000) in 2009.

There has been a prediction that by 2015 we could go to earn an annual target of US$ 30 billion as remittances if we could expand overseas job markets, make our migrant workers skilled, and remittances are sent through official channels.

So far we have no tangible progress in this regard. According to a senior official of the Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training (BMET), the country has reached an amount of US$ 15 billion as remittances by 2015 if the existing trend of migration continues.

In the present scenario, the labour migration sector has been facing the following challenges: lack of initiative to make the potential migrants more skilled and efficient for the prospective jobs, lack of capacity, governance, responsibility and accountability both in public and private sectors with regard to managing the ever growing demand, growing incidents of abuses and exploitations in the migration processes at home and abroad (some of which are tantamount to human trafficking), lack of administrative and legal framework to prevent and prosecute those wrong doings effectively etc.

Though there have been some initiatives for offering training to the potential migrants through government run training centers, however, those are not systematic, and not up to the mark to meet the need of the present global standard. Our workers lack in skills of language and attitude and manner as well.

That is why our migrant workers find them helpless while they are joining in the real work abroad.

The workers from Philippines or Sri Lanka who are adequately skilled could bargain for their services and are less vulnerable for their empowerment being skilled and could earn two to five times more for the same work and time in comparison with Bangladeshi workers.

The skill training provided by the so-called private recruiting or other agencies are simply a way of grabbing money from the innocent migrants.

Though there are nearly 800 Recruiting Agencies, however, government does not have adequate monitoring mechanism and schemes to oversee their activities. Also, there is no training program as such for the staff members of those agencies on ethics, human rights and other related issues. The apex body of the Bangladesh Association of International Recruiting Agencies (BAIRA) is also failing to make effective monitoring over its respective members and combating unholy recruiting practices by its members.

There have been unholy networks and competitions among the Recruiting Agencies and their agents at home and abroad. That is why the migration costs are scoring high violating the amount prescribed by the government. Where the employers are paying pre-migration remittances for hiring a female migrant worker, on the contrary the Recruiting Agencies are charging a significant amount from them (migrant). These practices do force a migrant to sell out his/her belongings or take loan with exorbitant interest rates. That is also contributing to landlessness of exploited migrants (both male and female) as a 2008 study of the International Organiz-ation for Migration (IOM) conducted by Professor Mokaddem Hossian and Professor Mahbuba Nasreen in Bangladesh shown.

We are very much focused on the total amount of the remittances earned annually; however, unfortunately, we are not focusing on the individual exploitations and violations of rights of an individual migrant. That is why there is need to make a balance between the two.

Though the Constitution of the country guarantees equal protection of law, and freedom from all forms of exploitations, unfortunately, those guarantees are not working in case of the sufferings of the migrant workers. The respective state machineries are failing in this respect. The National Human Rights Commission should take note of that.

The capacities of the related government agencies, i.e., Ministry of Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas Employment (MOEWOE), Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training (BMET) and District Employment and Manpower Office (DEMO) do not have sufficient manpower to manage this huge sector.

Although most of our migrant workers are going abroad through their own connections or through the Recruiting Agencies, however, the government has an overall role to monitor, regulate and govern the sector.

The manpower at all the related agencies mentioned are not adequate in number as required and not qualified, trained or motivated for their respective jobs for so many reasons. There is also lack of budgetary, logistical and other constraints.

The total number of Labour Attaches is now 14 who are based in 12 countries. Those officers are deputed from the administration and other cadres. There has been demand for a permanent cadre for the Labour Attaches who would be adequately trained and could manage the sector either working at home or abroad.

The Secretary to the MOEWOE, Dr. Zafar Ahmed Khan mentioned at a seminar in Dhaka on 11 October 2010 that though there is a huge contribution to our remittances by the migrant workers, however, the sector is not getting adequate attention of the government, and there is no well-coordinated planning so far. According to him, the growth of remittances flow since 2001 is 17% per year on an average. The official remittances flow is 13% GDP. It is 12 and 6 times more respectively of the Overseas Development Assistance (ODA), and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

However, as he exampled, the ERD has four times more staff members than the MOEWOE, where the former (ERD) manage an annual aid flow of nearly US$ 1.5 billion.

There is a lack of comprehensive legal framework to govern the migration sector. The major legal instrument, the Emigration Ordinance, 1982 (complemented by three Rules in 2002), does not have sufficient scope to protect the rights of the migrant workers in case of their violations of rights. There is lack of remedial measures and activities due to “narrow provision” in related law, and also lack of understanding and training on other alternative laws. Therefore, there is a growing acknowledgment for adoption of a comprehensive legal framework to manage the migration sector efficiently (i.e. along with a law penalizing human trafficking in the form of labour migration and related exploitations).

The reported corruption by those who are managing and running the migration activities needs to be intervened. This is allegedly happening in processing recruitment order, issuing clearance and immigration processes.

Bangladesh also did not ratify the major human rights treaty dealing with the migrants workers, the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, 1990 (the Convention). The country has signed it on 7 October 1998, though the Law Commission had recommended for its ratification that time.

It is now widely acknowledge that Bangladesh should ratify the Convention immediately. The ratification would boost country’s image with regard to its commitment for promoting and protecting human rights; at the same time it would contribute to the streamlining the administrative and legal frameworks and measures and initiating related institutional mechanisms among others as demanded by the Convention. However, only ratification will bring no benefit if it is not adopted in the domestic legislation and implemented progressively. In this case, the above-mentioned points deserve serious consideration.

There are quarters with their vested interests who are opposing the ratification of the Convention and reform in the migration management.

As a legal researcher and practitioner, I do observe that there will be no additional obligations (other than the Constitutional and other obligations already in place through ratification of other related international human rights instruments) on Bangladesh, if it ratifies the Convention.

I am also worried with one phenomenon: there are bunch of studies, series of meetings, discussions, or consultations on migration sectors by various stake holders including by the government and the development partners (of course there are duplications as well).

The MOEWOE has drafted a 9-point strategy paper in 2007. The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) undertook five studies including the review of the overall labour migration sector of Bangladesh. All the reports had reportedly been submitted to respective ministries and departments. However, there is no reported follow-up activity so far. There are initiatives by others. All those need a well-coordination.

Also, there is lack of effective coordination among the related ministries and departments in managing and regulating the migration sector. There should be working coordination among them (especially, the MOEWOE, and ministries like Foreign Affairs, Home Affairs, Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs among others).

Given the importance of the sector, there is a dire need to establish a center of excellence, devoted training, research, publication and advocacy on migration related issues at national, regional and international level. Also, a higher authority under the Office of the Prime Minister should work to bring coordination among the activities.

We also need to incorporate migration related courses at our mainstream education from higher to university levels (i.e., as part of social science, human rights and legal course). That will contribute to have a pool of future government officials, administrators, academics, diplomats, lawyers, judges among others sensitized on migration issues.

Curriculum of specialized training institutes like Bangladesh Public Administration Training Center, Bangladesh Civil Service Academy, Bangladesh Institute of Administration Management, Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development, Foreign Service Academy, Judicial Administration Training Institution, Bangladesh Bar Council among others should introduce migration issues in their training curriculum. That would contribute immediately to have a pool of government officials and other practitioners to manage, bargain, and negotiate effectively activities related to migration sector.

Dr. Uttam Kumar Das is Deputy Director, South Asian Institute of Advanced Legal and Human Rights Studies (SAILS), Dhaka.


* Originally appeared in the Daily Sun newspaper in Dhaka as a serialized article on 5, 6, and 7 November 2010. Links:

http://www.daily-sun.com/index.php?view=details&archiev=yes&arch_date=05-11-2010&type=daily_sun_news&pub_no=31&menu_id=17&news_type_id=1&news_id=5452

http://www.daily-sun.com/index.php?view=details&archiev=yes&arch_date=06-11-2010&type=daily_sun_news&pub_no=32&menu_id=17&news_type_id=1&news_id=5681

http://www.daily-sun.com/index.php?view=details&archiev=yes&arch_date=07-11-2010&type=daily_sun_news&pub_no=33&menu_id=17&news_type_id=1&news_id=5916